Skip to content

Neural ODEs for Battery Degradation

This document explains Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) and their application to battery degradation modeling.

Overview

Neural ODEs enable continuous-time modeling of battery degradation trajectories, allowing predictions at arbitrary time points and physics-informed modeling.

Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)

Basic Form

An ODE describes how a state vector \(\mathbf{z}(t) \in \mathbb{R}^d\) evolves over time:

\[ \frac{d\mathbf{z}(t)}{dt} = f(\mathbf{z}(t), t, \theta) \]

Solution

Given an initial condition \(\mathbf{z}(t_0)\), the state at any time \(t_i\) is found by solving the Initial Value Problem (IVP):

\[ \mathbf{z}(t_i) = \mathbf{z}(t_0) + \int_{t_0}^{t_i} f(\mathbf{z}(s), s, \theta) ds = \text{ODESolve}(\mathbf{z}(t_0), f, t_0, t_i, \theta) \]

Neural ODEs

Concept

In a Neural ODE, the dynamics function \(f\) is approximated by a neural network with parameters \(\theta\):

\[ \frac{d\mathbf{z}(t)}{dt} = \text{NN}(\mathbf{z}(t), t, \theta) \]

Optimization via Adjoint Sensitivity

To train the model, we need gradients of a loss \(L\) with respect to \(\theta\). The Adjoint Method avoids backpropagating through the internal stages of the ODE solver by solving a second, backwards-in-time ODE for the "adjoint" state \(\mathbf{a}(t) = \partial L / \partial \mathbf{z}(t)\):

\[ \frac{d\mathbf{a}(t)}{dt} = -\mathbf{a}(t)^\top \frac{\partial f(\mathbf{z}(t), t, \theta)}{\partial \mathbf{z}} \]

This allows for constant memory cost \(O(1)\) relative to the number of solver steps.

Application to Battery Degradation

Degradation Trajectory

Battery degradation can be modeled as:

dSOH/dt = f(SOH, conditions, t)

Where:

  • SOH: State of Health
  • conditions: Temperature, C-rate, etc.
  • f: Degradation dynamics (learned by neural network)

Latent State

Use latent state to capture degradation mechanisms:

dz/dt = NN(z, conditions, t)
SOH = Decoder(z)

Where:

  • z: Latent degradation state
  • Decoder: Maps latent state to SOH

Implementation in BatteryML

NeuralODEModel

The NeuralODEModel implements continuous-time degradation:

from src.models.neural_ode import NeuralODEModel

model = NeuralODEModel(
    input_dim=5,           # Features per time step
    latent_dim=32,         # Latent state dimension
    hidden_dim=64,         # ODE function hidden dimension
    solver='dopri5',       # ODE solver
    use_adjoint=True       # Memory-efficient gradients
)

Architecture

  1. Encoder: Maps input sequence to initial latent state
  2. ODE Function: Neural network defining dynamics
  3. ODE Solver: Numerical integration (e.g., Runge-Kutta)
  4. Decoder: Maps latent state to predictions

Training

from src.training.trainer import Trainer

trainer = Trainer(model, config, tracker)
history = trainer.fit(train_samples, val_samples)

ODE Solvers

Adaptive Solvers

  • dopri5: Adaptive Runge-Kutta (most accurate, slower)
  • adaptive_heun: Adaptive Heun method

Fixed-Step Solvers

  • euler: Euler method (fastest, less accurate)
  • rk4: 4th-order Runge-Kutta (balanced)

Solver Selection

  • Accuracy: Use dopri5 for high accuracy
  • Speed: Use euler for fast training
  • Balance: Use rk4 for balanced performance

Adjoint Method

Memory Efficiency

The adjoint method enables memory-efficient backpropagation:

model = NeuralODEModel(use_adjoint=True)  # Saves memory

How It Works

Instead of storing intermediate states, the adjoint method:

  1. Solves forward ODE
  2. Solves backward adjoint ODE
  3. Computes gradients efficiently

Advantages for Battery Modeling

  1. Interpolation: Predict at arbitrary time points
  2. Extrapolation: Extend trajectories beyond training data
  3. Physics: Can incorporate physical constraints
  4. Uncertainty: Can quantify prediction uncertainty

Challenges

  1. Training Time: Slower than discrete models
  2. Memory: Can be memory-intensive
  3. Stability: Requires careful initialization
  4. Hyperparameters: Many hyperparameters to tune

Best Practices

  1. Start Simple: Begin with simple architecture
  2. Tune Solver: Choose appropriate solver
  3. Use Adjoint: Enable adjoint method for memory
  4. Monitor Training: Watch for NaN losses
  5. Validate: Verify predictions are reasonable

Comparison with Other Models

vs. LSTM

  • Neural ODE: Continuous-time, physics-informed
  • LSTM: Discrete-time, sequence modeling

vs. LightGBM

  • Neural ODE: Continuous-time, flexible
  • LightGBM: Fast, interpretable

References

  • Neural ODE paper (Chen et al., 2018)
  • ODE solver literature
  • Battery degradation modeling papers

Next Steps